Clean Nepal Constitution translates complex text into plain language, shows precise fixes, and invites verifiable, low-noise participation. Vote on each reform so we can prioritize what matters most.
Preparing the live embed…
If it doesn’t load, open the channel.
Original Text
Provided that, the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority shall not have jurisdiction over any policy decision made by the Council of Ministers or any committee thereof or decision made by a minister while discharging the functions of his or her office.
Proposed Amendment
The Commission shall have jurisdiction to investigate all acts, decisions, and omissions of the executive, including ministerial and cabinet-level actions, irrespective of their designation as ‘policy decisions.’ Only laws duly enacted by the Federal Parliament are exempt.
Why it matters
Closes the ‘policy decision’ loophole shielding ministerial corruption by labeling illicit acts as policy decisions.
Example
Imagine if a mayor gave a road contract to his brother but said, 'This is a policy decision.' Today ministers use the same excuse to escape investigation. This reform means no one can hide corruption just by calling it a policy.
Original Text
There shall be a Judicial Council to make recommendation for the appointment of, transfer of, disciplinary action against and dismissal of Judges, which shall consist of: (a) Chief Justice — Chairperson; (b) Senior most Judge of the Supreme Court — Member; (c) Minister for Law and Justice — Member; (d) Senior Advocate or Advocate with ≥20 years’ experience — Member; (e) One person nominated by the President on recommendation of the Prime Minister — Member.
Proposed Amendment
Council to consist of Chief Justice (Chair), two senior-most SC Judges, one Nepal Bar Association nominee, and one eminent jurist nominated by President on recommendation of Constitutional Council. No serving minister or political officeholder eligible.
Why it matters
Removes political influence from judicial appointments, strengthening independence.
Example
Think of a football match where the referee is chosen by one of the teams. The referee won’t be fair. That’s what happens when politicians pick judges. This reform makes sure judges are chosen by independent people, like having neutral referees.
Original Text
Where a Proclamation of State of Emergency has been issued pursuant to Article 273, the fundamental rights conferred by this Constitution may be suspended during the period of operation of the Proclamation.
Proposed Amendment
Add: Notwithstanding the foregoing, freedom of the press, the right to information, and whistleblower protections shall not be suspended under any circumstance.
Why it matters
Safeguards transparency and accountability during crises, reducing risks of corruption and abuse.
Example
During a flood, the government gets money for relief. If leaders shut down newspapers and radio, people won’t know if the money is stolen. This reform ensures press and information rights stay on, so citizens can check if help actually reaches them.
Original Text
Subject to this Constitution, the power of the Federation, State and Local level shall be as provided in Schedules 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Federal law prevails in case of conflict with State law.
Proposed Amendment
In concurrent matters, provincial legislation shall prevail unless expressly overridden by a federal statute passed by a two-thirds majority.
Why it matters
Clarifies accountability and prevents rent-seeking in grey zones by balancing federal and state authority.
Example
Imagine if both your parents and your school gave different orders about the same homework. You’d be confused and might get punished twice. That’s how provinces and the federal government clash today. This reform clears up who’s in charge so rules aren’t abused.
Original Text
Any Nepali citizen may, subject to law, form and operate political parties. Conditions for registration include party name, objectives, constitution and rules consistent with this Constitution and laws.
Proposed Amendment
Compulsory internal elections every ≤5 years; maximum of 2 consecutive leadership terms; annual audited accounts; beneficial-ownership registry of donors; machine-readable disclosures.
Why it matters
Ensures internal democracy and transparency, reducing oligarchic capture and opaque financing.
Example
Think of a school where the same captain is chosen every year without elections. Other students never get a chance. That’s how political parties work today. This reform forces them to hold elections and audits, so power and money don’t stay in the same hands forever.
Original Text
If a member who has been elected to the House of Representatives or State Assembly as a candidate from a political party votes contrary to the direction issued by the political party, the seat of such member shall be vacant.
Proposed Amendment
Whip applies only to confidence, no-confidence, budget, and national security votes. Members may vote independently on other legislation without losing their seat.
Why it matters
Restores parliamentary independence and oversight by reducing excessive control from party leadership.
Example
Imagine a cricket team where every player must only hit the ball where the captain says, even if it loses the match. That’s what MPs face today. This reform lets MPs decide freely on most issues, except in big survival votes.
Original Text
No specific constitutional requirement for transparent local procurement or audits of local budgets.
Proposed Amendment
All local procurements must be conducted via national e-procurement platforms and audited annually by Provincial PACs.
Why it matters
Prevents misuse of development funds and strengthens local accountability.
Example
Imagine if the school principal only buys sports equipment from his cousin’s shop, paying double the price. That’s what mayors do with road projects. This reform makes all purchases open and online, so the best deal wins.
Original Text
No constitutional provision for whistleblower protections.
Proposed Amendment
No person shall be punished, prosecuted, or harassed for disclosing, in good faith, information or evidence of corruption, maladministration, or misuse of public office.
Why it matters
Protects insiders and journalists, creating a culture of transparency.
Example
If a student tells the teacher someone is cheating, but instead of punishing the cheater, the teacher punishes the student — no one will ever speak up again. That’s how whistleblowers are treated in Nepal. This reform protects them so the truth can come out safely.
Draft “organic” laws that turn constitutional ideas into enforceable rules—clear mandates, fair processes, and open-data obligations.
Empowers the anti-corruption commission over ministerial and cabinet actions; policy-decision review; publication of decisions and conflict-of-interest disclosures.
Reconstitutes the Judicial Council with a judicial majority; transparent nominations, public shortlists, asset disclosures, fair-process rules.
Protects press freedom, right to information, and whistleblowers during emergencies; open procurement lanes; time-limits and reporting.
Clarifies concurrency: provincial law prevails unless overridden by a super-majority federal statute; adds dispute-resolution and impact assessments.
Internal elections (≤5 years), leadership term-limits, audited accounts, beneficial-ownership donor registers, machine-readable disclosures.
Binds whips to confidence/no-confidence/budget/national security; safeguards committee oversight and free votes elsewhere.
Mandatory e-procurement; standardized tenders/contracts; annual audits by Provincial PACs; open data portals.
Safe reporting channels, confidentiality, anti-retaliation, interim relief and remedies; covers officials, contractors, journalists in good faith.